MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 15210: Association of Circulating Biomarkers With Progressive Left Ventricular Remodeling and Hypertrophy in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: Results From the Progressa Study

2022· article· en· W4380785751 on OpenAlexaff
Kathia Abdoun, Lionel Tastet, Mylène Shen, Romain Capoulade, Marie‐Ange Fleury, Marie Arsenault, Élisabeth Bédard, Philippe Pîbarot

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineAsymptomaticStenosisVentricular remodelingLeft ventricular hypertrophyMuscle hypertrophyDoppler echocardiographyHeart failureBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with progressive left ventricular (LV) remodeling and hypertrophy, ultimately leading to cardiac decompensation. Measurement of circulating biomarkers may be useful to identify AS patients with higher risk of maladaptive LV remodeling, a potent marker of the transition to heart failure. We hypothesized that multiple circulating biomarkers are associated with faster progression of LV hypertrophy in patients with AS. Methods: One hundred and forty-six asymptomatic AS patients (66±13years, 75% male) prospectively enrolled in the PROGRESSA study (NCT01679431) were included in this sub-analysis. All patients underwent Doppler-echocardiography to measure AS severity, LV mass indexed to body surface area (LVMi) and LV relative wall thickness (RWT). The annualized changes in LVMi and RWT were calculated between baseline and last follow-up visit (mean follow-up of 2.5±1.88 years). Results: At baseline, 16% of patients had mild (i.e. peak aortic jet velocity [Vpeak] 2.0-2.9 m/s),76% moderate (Vpeak 3.0-3.9 m/s), and 8% severe (Vpeak ≥4.0 m/s) AS, mean LVMi and RWT were 106±23 g/m 2 and 0.47±0.07 respectively. Among biomarkers, baseline level of triglycerides, D-dimer and tumor antigen 125(Ca-125) were significantly associated with LVMi progression rate (β:0.16,p≤0.05), (β:0.18,p≤0.05) and(β:-0.20,p≤0.05) respectively. Soluble (ST2) protein and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were the only factors independently associated with the annualized change in RWT. In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, AS severity, cardiac biomarkers; triglycerides and D-dimers remained significantly associated with faster progression rate of LVMi (all, p≤0.05), while lower level of CA125 remained significantly associated with LVMi annualized change (β=-0.21, p=0.01). After similar multivariate adjustment, higher levels of ST2 and ALP remained significantly associated with faster progression rate of RWT (all, p≤0.05). Conclusion: Several blood biomarkers were independently associated with faster progression of LV remodeling and hypertrophy in patients with AS. A multiple biomarker approach may be useful to assess LV health and predict the risk of early phases of heart failure in AS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→