The role of organic carbon in the Southern Uplands-Down-Longford Terrane accretionary prism, Scotland and Ireland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbonaceous shales in the Southern Uplands-Down-Longford Terrane accretionary prism had extremely high potential for hydrocarbon generation in the Lower Paleozoic. Structural thickening in the prism enhanced the rapid generation of oil. Shale horizons are separated by thick turbidites composed of low-permeability greywackes, so oil under high fluid pressure either pooled along shale bedding surfaces or migrated into fractured greywackes. Pooled oil became solidified to bitumen, which locally formed deposits on a scale of tonnes, mined as coal. The carbon-rich shale also sequestered large amounts of sulfur from seawater, which precipitated as pyrite firstly during early diagenesis, then further during fluid flow through the shale beds. The oil was also sulfur-bearing. Deformation focused on the shale beds during the evolution of the accretionary prism would have been closely related to the fluid flow which precipitated bitumen and sulfides. The palaeo-fluids were also anomalously rich in methane and hydrogen, similar to fluids venting from modern accretionary prisms. Supplementary material: details of localities searched for coal in Lower Palaeozoic, Southern Uplands-Down-Longford Terrane (locations shown in Fig. 6 ) are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6691597
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".