MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380791612 · doi:10.32920/23523402.v1

Fabrication of Free-Standing Structures Using Abrasive/Slurry Jet Micro-Machining

2023· preprint· en· W4380791612 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ehsan Azarsa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Surface Polishing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMachiningMaterials scienceAbrasiveHeat sinkMoldMicrofluidicsSlurryMechanical engineeringFabricationComposite materialNanotechnologyMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Many advanced engineering materials are machined using abrasive water jets, a non-traditional machining method that has certain advantages compared to other approaches. This dissertation aims at developing methodologies to use abrasive water and slurry jets to micro-machine free-standing structures for heat sink and microfluidics applications.</p> <p>The first aim was to fabricate high aspect ratio free-standing structures with a minimum distance between each other that would lead to maximum heat transfer performance in heat sinks. The effect of machining process parameters on the quality of the resulting free-standing structures was studied. It was demonstrated that high-quality free-standing structures with aspect ratios of more than 40 to be used as fins in heat sinks could be fabricated.</p> <p>There is an increasing demand for metallic micro-molds that can be used for inexpensive mass production of polymeric microfluidic chips. Therefore, the feasibility of using abrasive water jet micro-machining (AWJM) and abrasive slurry jet micro-machining (ASJM) to fabricate such micro-molds was studied. Jet raster scans under various combinations of process parameters were used in order to machine micro-pockets containing free-standing structures, representing molds for casting microfluidic chips with channel networks. The optimum process parameters and material were determined in order to fabricate the molds with the best possible surface finish.</p> <p>Because unmasked machining could not be used to fabricate molds with sharp-edged intersecting features, a hybrid AWJM/ASJM masked machining technique was introduced. By careful selection of the process parameters, high quality molds with both single and intersecting free-standing structures at multiple heights could be fabricated, thus making three-dimensional microfluidic chip mold fabrication feasible.</p> <p>Finally, a new method of mold fabrication that utilized water jet cutting technology to cut free-standing structures out of mild steel sheets, to be used as a mold for PDMS casting, was developed. This enabled 3D features having very abrupt changes in depth with almost 90o angles for use in microfluidic devices. As a proof-of-concept, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chip was made and tested. It was shown that this alternative approach to create microfluidic molds is versatile and may find utility in reducing the cost and complexity involved in fabricating 3D features in microfluidic devices.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Surface Polishing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207