MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 10740: Effects of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System Inhibitors on Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques: Results From the Paradigm Registry

2022· article· en· W4380793342 on OpenAlexaff
Curtis Williams, Donghee Han, Hidenobu Takagi, Christopher B. Fordyce, Stephanie Sellers, Philipp Blanke, Fay Y. Lin, Mouaz H. Al‐Mallah, Matthew J. Budoff, Filippo Cademartiri, Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan, Edoardo Conte, Hugo Marques, Ilan Gottlieb, Martin Hadamitzky, Sanghoon Shin, Byoung Kwon Lee, Renu Virmani, Habib Samady, Jung Hyun Choi, Daniel S. Berman, Jagat Narula, Jeroen J. Bax, Jonathon Leipsic, Hyuk‐Jae Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtheromaCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineCardiologyCoronary atherosclerosisFibrous capAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseVulnerable plaqueDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Coronary CT Angiogram (CCTA) has become a powerful tool in the diagnosis and risk stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD), but can also provide unique insight into the effects of pharmacotherapy on the progression of atherosclerosis. Although Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System (RAAS) inhibitors are indicated in patients with stable CAD, their impact on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis is unclear. Methods: We performed a prospective, multinational study consisting of a registry of patients without history of CAD who underwent serial CCTAs at an interscan interval of >2 years. Patients taking RAAS inhibitors were propensity matched to RAAS inhibitor naïve patients based on clinical and CCTA characteristics at the baseline. Atherosclerotic plaques in CCTAs were quantitatively analyzed for percent atheroma volume (PAV) according to plaque composition (necrotic core, fibro-fatty plaque, fibrous plaque, and calcium) using predefined Hounsfield unit thresholds. Results: Of 1,248 patients from the registry, 299 RAAS inhibitor taking patients were matched to 299 RAAS inhibitor naïve patients. Over a median interval of 3.9 years, there was no significant difference in annual progression of total PAV between RAAS inhibitor naive vs taking patients (0.75 vs 0.79 %/year, p = 0.66), nor was there any difference in the progression of necrotic core (-0.02 vs 0.002 %/year, p = 0.09), fibrofatty plaque (-0.03 vs.0.05 %/year, p = 0.67), fibrous plaque (0.29 vs 0.25 %/year, p =0.91), or calcified plaque (0.51 vs. 0.51 %/year, p = 0.37). Conclusions: Within this cohort of patients, the use of RAAS inhibitors over a period of nearly 4 years did not have a measurable impact on progression of total atherosclerotic plaque or any plaque subtypes assessed by CCTA. These results suggest that the benefit of RAAS inhibition is independent of an effect on coronary plaque progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207