Abstract 10337: Early Adaptation of the Mitral Valve After St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with worse outcomes and higher mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). Clinical observations and experimental data have shown that mitral valve leaflets have the potential to enlarge over time to compensate left ventricular remodeling and prevent IMR. Previous animal studies have demonstrated that MI is associated with fibrotic changes in the mitral valve leaflets and prevent this adaptive compensation. However, the timing of mitral valve geometric changes are not well described. While previous data shows an increase in leaflet size at 6 and 12 months after MI, its short-term evolution after an ischemic event is not well documented. Methods: Twenty-two patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and initial left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% were enrolled in Quebec Heart and Lung Institute. Participants had 3D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at baseline and 3 months, as well as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 3-month follow-up. Mitral valve leaflet size was measured from the 3D TTE using a custom software (Omni4D). CMR was used to derive left ventricular volumes, function and mitral regurgitant volume. Significant IMR was defined as a mitral regurgitant fraction ≥ 15% derived from the 3-month CMR. Results: Twenty-one of the 22 patients completed the imaging follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction at 3 months was 53 ± 10% (range from 37 to 69%). Eight patients (38%) had mild IMR at 3 months. Mitral valve surface area was significantly increased at 3 months compared with baseline for patients without IMR (10.96 ± 1.78 cm 2 vs 9.51 ± 1.62 cm 2 ; p = 0.001). Valve enlargement vs baseline was significantly greater in patients without IMR (+17 ± 13% vs -5 ± 4% for those with IMR at follow-up, p=0.0007). Conclusions: Mitral valvular surface increases within the first few months after MI, but not in all patients. Adequate valve enlargement seems related to the absence of IMR at 3 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".