Abstract 10514: Compromised Cerebral Artery Integrity is Associated With Brain Tissue Injury and Cognition Deficits in Adolescents With Complex Congenital Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Adolescents with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD) show brain tissue injury in regions associated with cognitive deficits. Alteration in cerebral artery integrity (CAI), as measured by arterial transit time (ATT), may lead to perfusion deficits, and be a potential cause of brain injury in CCHD. To date, there are no reports of CAI in CCHD or associations between CAI, brain tissue integrity, and cognition in CCHD. Methods: 70 subjects (37 CCHD / 33 controls), 14-18 years of age, undergone surgical palliation (CCHD), and no contraindications for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and healthy controls (age- and sex-matched) participated. Participants completed cognitive testing (Montreal Assessment of Cognition [MoCA] and the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning [General Memory Index, GMI]) and brain MRI using 3.0 Tesla scanner. ATT values (via diffusion-weighted pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling [pCASL] procedures), and regional brain mean diffusivity [MD] (measure of tissue integrity) were computed in whole brain. Descriptive, partial correlations, and ANCOVA analyses used (covariates, age and sex). Results: Mean MoCA [23.1 ± 4.1 vs. 28.1 ± 2.3; p <.001] and GMI scores [86.8 ± 15.4 vs. 110.3 ± 14.5; p<.001] show significant cognitive deficits in CCHD compared to controls. ATT was significantly increased in CCHD vs controls (mean ± SD, sec, 1.3±0.13 vs 1.22±0.13, p=0.02), respectively, indicating compromised CAI. Partial correlations between ATT, MD values, and cognition (covariates, age and sex, p< 0.005) showed significant associations in various areas including the hippocampus, prefrontal cortices, cerebellum, frontal white matter, anterior and posterior cingulate, frontal cortex, temporal cortices, and midbrain. Conclusion: Adolescents with CCHD have prolonged ATTs compared to controls indicative of compromised CAI and altered cerebral perfusion. CAI is significantly associated with alterations in regional brain tissue integrity and cognitive impairment. Further evaluation is needed to test interventions to increase cerebral perfusion and to protect neural tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".