MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 11882: Exploring Abnormalities in Coronary Vascular Resistance Reserve as a Distinct Feature of The Hfpef Syndrome in Women

2022· article· en· W4380793833 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Crosier, Lisa Mielniczuk, Robert A. deKemp, Rob Beanlands, Peter P. Liu, Thais Coutinho

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsOttawa Heart InstituteMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionInternal medicineCoronary flow reserveCoronary artery diseaseVascular resistanceEjection fractionHeart failureBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is more common in women than men, but mechanisms underlying this female predominance are incompletely understood. Impaired systemic vasodilatory reserve and coronary microvascular dysfunction have been separately described as key abnormalities of HFpEF. However, the coronary vascular resistance reserve (CVRR), defined as the drop in coronary vascular resistance (CVR) from rest to peak stress, and its sex-specific nuances have not been explored in HFpEF. We sought to: (1) determine whether stress CVR differs between HFpEF and controls, and (2) assess sex differences in CVRR in HFpEF. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of 32 HFpEF participants and 26 controls, all without obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease. HFpEF was defined according to ESC Guidelines. Dipyridamole stress 82 Rb positron emission tomography was performed, and rest and stress CVR was calculated by dividing mean arterial pressure by coronary flow at rest and stress. Multivariable linear regression assessed (1) the association of HFpEF with stress CVR; and (2) the association of female sex with CVRR in patients with and without HFpEF. Results: Mean age was 74±7 years, 67% were women and mean LVEF was 62±5%: no difference between HFpEF and controls (P>0.05 for each). Results of the multivariable models are summarized in the Image. HFpEF was independently associated with higher global left ventricular CVR at peak vasodilatory stress. In addition, women had lower global left ventricular CVRR as compared to men, and this was unique to women with HFpEF. Results were the same for coronary-specific CVR and CVRR (analyses not shown). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to non-invasively explore CVR and CVRR in HFpEF. Our findings suggest increased stress CVR in HFpEF, with a distinct abnormality in CVRR in women with HFpEF. Abnormal CVRR in women may contribute to the female predominance of HFpEF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→