MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 12680: Alcohol Consumption and Arrhythmia Recurrence After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022· review· en· W4380793848 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Grindal, Robert Sparrow, David Conen, Jeff S. Healey, Jorge Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationOdds ratioMeta-analysisInternal medicineCatheter ablationAlcoholObservational studyAlcohol consumptionCardiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Whether alcohol consumption increases the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following catheter ablation for AF remains unclear. We aimed to systematically review the medical literature to assess the impact of alcohol consumption on the recurrence of AF following AF Hypothesis: Elevated levels of alcohol consumption are associated with increased rates of AF recurrence following AF ablation. Methods: A structured electronic database search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CONTROL; inception - December 2021) of the scientific literature was performed for studies reporting rates of AF recurrence following catheter ablation stratified by patients’ level of alcohol consumption. Alcohol use was dichotomized into categories which represented moderate-heavy alcohol use or those that represented abstention or rare alcohol use. Study specific odds rations (ORs) were meta-analyzed using a random effects model. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: A total of nine observational studies were identified, which included 5436 patients undergoing catheter ablation. There was substantial variation in the categories used to stratify alcohol consumption. Compared to patients consuming little to no alcohol, patients consuming moderate to high amounts of alcohol had a greater odds of AF recurrence (OR 1.45 [95% CI: 1.06-1.99, p = 0.02]; I 2 = 79%). This relationship remained significant after exclusion of studies with < 100 participants (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.03-1.90, p = 0.03) and when abstract-only publications were excluded (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.21-2.80, p = 0.004). All included studies were found to be at serious risk of bias, mainly due to confounding. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: Increased alcohol consumption is associated with increased rates of AF recurrence following catheter ablation for AF. Reduction of alcohol consumption post ablation may reduce AF recurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.027
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→