MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 12635: Mortality Risks and Need For Transplant in Pediatric Heart Disease Associated With Lower Ses and Greater Remoteness of Residence From Cardiac Care

2022· article· en· W4380794156 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer Conway, Christopher Smith, Douglas C. Dover, Andrew S. Mackie, Padma Kaul, Lisa K. Hornberger

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCanadian VIGOUR CentreStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSocioeconomic statusHazard ratioPediatricsHeart failureResidenceProportional hazards modelHeart diseasevalvular heart diseaseAsymptomaticDiseaseInternal medicineDemographyPopulationConfidence intervalEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Socioeconomic status (SES) and remoteness of residence (RoR) may contribute to worse clinical outcomes. Whether this is true in universal healthcare is not certain. We sought to explore associations between SES and RoR, from centralized pediatric cardiac care, and a composite of mortality and need for transplant (Tx) in children with congenital (CHD) and acquired heart disease (AHD). Methods: All infants born in Alberta, Canada between 01/01/05 and 31/12/17, and diagnosed before 31/12/17 were included. CHD was categorized as mild, moderate or severe based on the Bethesda Task Force. AHD included cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, heart failure, rheumatic heart disease and endocarditis. Socioeconomic status (SES) was defined by the Canadian Index of Multiple Depravation’s vulnerability index and RoR was calculated using the drive time to one of two pediatric cardiology centers. Risk factors for a composite of mortality and Tx were explored using Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: Among 12,542 children, 74.5% (n=9347) had mild CHD, 13.8% (n=1733) moderate, 5.7% (n=717), severe and 5.9% (n=745) AHD. The composite outcome was highest in severe CHD (19.0%), compared to 13.0% in moderate, 0.5% for mild and 6.9% in AHD, with n=41 undergoing Tx. Among children with CHD, RoR (>180mins, p=0.018), but not SES, was associated with all-cause mortality/Tx (Table 1), while neither RoR (p=0.73) nor SES (p=0.98) were associated with cardiovascular (CV)-specific mortality/Tx. For AHD there was no association between RoR (p=0.73) and SES (p=0.98) with all-cause mortality/Tx (Table 1). Conclusions: Despite Canada’s universal healthcare, children with CHD who live remotely are at increased risk of all-cause mortality/Tx. This is independent of SES and was not true for children with AHD or CV mortality/Tx in those with CHD. Therefore, further understanding of the causes of death in children who live remotely with CHD may help in improving overall outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→