MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 14369: “July Effect”: Impact of Academic Year Transition on In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Cardiac Arrest

2022· article· en· W4380795249 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Favour Markson, Richard Orji, Onoriode Kesiena, Ali Horoub, Chidiebele Omaliko

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHospital Admissions and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency medicineQuarter (Canadian coin)Retrospective cohort studySample size determinationPediatricsDemographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The transition of training to a new Academic year and the beginning of training for new interns and fellows have been suggested to affect the quality of patient care and health care outcomes in critically ill patients, a phenomenon known as the “July Effect” in the United States. Prior studies have shown mixed reports regarding the “July Effect” existence. This study provides an insight into the “July Effect” in patients who suffered Cardiac arrest using a National Database. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National inpatient sample (2016- 2019). The NIS was searched for hospitalized adult patients with cardiac arrest as a principal diagnosis. We subsequently divided our sample into two cohorts based on the quarter of training (1st quarter, July to September, and the Last quarter of Training April to June). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the length of stay (LOS), total hospitalization charges (THC), and transfer frequency to other acute care facilities. Results: There were 27,940 Patients who suffered a cardiac arrest in the first and last quarter of our study period. Approximately 49.2% (13,755) vs. 50.8% (14,185) patients were identified in the 1st and Last quarters, respectively. There was a similar distribution of Age (63.5 ± 0.2) and Sex (Females) (43%) in both cohorts. There was similar inpatient mortality for patients who presented in both quarters (AOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.855-1.14, p=0.935). There was also no significant difference in LOS (adjusted coefficient -0.19, 95% CI -0.50-0.46, p=0.937), THC (adjusted coefficient 115.9, 95% CI -6483.46 - 6715, p=0.973) and frequency of transfer to other acute care facilities (AOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.11, p=0.57). Conclusions: This study suggests that the “July Effect” is not apparent in patients who suffered cardiac arrest as there were no significant differences in the rate of in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total hospitalization charges, and frequency of transfer to other acute care facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicHospital Admissions and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207