Abstract 13950: Dynamic Myocardial Systolic and Diastolic Response to Exercise in Patients After the Fontan Operation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Exercise capacity is one of the predictors of morbidity and mortality in patients after the Fontan circulation. The influence of myocardial systolic and diastolic functional reserve on exercise performance has not been well established in this population. This study aimed at studying the myocardial response to exercise in Fontan patients using exercise echocardiography. Methods: Twenty-three Fontan patients with baseline ejection fraction >55% and 23 age and gender matched controls were included. A stepwise exercise stress echocardiography protocol was used. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) systolic (s’), and early diastolic (e’) velocities and myocardial acceleration during isovolumic contraction (IVA) were measured in the free wall of the dominant ventricle and interventricular septum and in the left ventricular free wall and septum of controls. Measurement was taken at rest and at incremental heart rate (HR). Changes in tissue Doppler velocities versus heart rate were studies and compared between patients and controls. Results: Resting HR was not significantly different between patients and controls but peak HR was lower in the Fontan group vs controls ( p <0.001). At rest patients had significantly lower lateral and septal e’ and s’ compared to controls (lateral s’: 6.35±1.05 vs. 14.41± 1.88 cm/s; lateral e’: 9.38±1.71 vs.20.66±2.55 cm/s; septal s’: 5.30±2.46 vs. 11.58±2.26 cm/s; septal e’: 10.45±2.46 vs. 17.80±1.58 cm/s P <0.001) except for IVA. At peak exercise, all variables were significantly lower in the patient group. During exercise, the slopes of lateral and septal s’ and IVA were significantly different between patients and controls except for e’. Conclusion: Our data suggest that patients with Fontan physiology have blunted systolic contractile response to exercise. Surprisingly our data suggest that the dynamic early diastolic myocardial reserve is preserved which suggest that early myocardial relaxation is not a limiting factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".