STUDI PERENCANAAN PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK TENAGA MIKROHIDRO PADA SALURAN IRIGASI DESA ANGANTAKA ABIANSEMAL BADUNG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The utilization of renewable energy can be a solution to meet the current increasing demand for electrical energy in rural areas, one of which is the use of water energy with the development of PLTMH. In this study, the planning of a microhydro power plant was carried out in the irrigation canal of Angantaka Abiansemal Badung Village as a source of electrical energy to meet the needs of electrical energy. The Angantaka Village irrigation channel has a head 2,1 meters, a width of 1,95 meters, an average depth of 0,88 meters and a water discharge of 0,3045 m3/s. The PLTMH planning system uses a breastshot wheel type water wheel with an efficiency of 75% and TEK STC-5 kW 3 phase AC synchronous generator and a 6 kW ELC control panel. Planning for PLTMH on the irrigation canal of Angantaka Abiansemal Badung Village with a capacity of 3,76 kW / 4,70 kVA. The initial investment cost required is IDR. 72.055.375 with operational and maintenance cost of IDR. 720.553 in one year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".