MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GRETTA: an R package for mapping <i>in silico</i> genetic interaction and essentiality networks

2023· article· en· W4380869524 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuka Takemon, Marco A. Marra

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreGenome British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamCanada Research ChairsBroad InstituteUniversity of AlabamaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
KeywordsDECIPHERIn silicoComputer scienceMIT LicenseDocumentationComputational biologySource codeBiologyGeneticsGeneSoftwareProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: Mapping genetic interactions and essentiality networks in human cell lines has been used to identify vulnerabilities of cells carrying specific genetic alterations and to associate novel functions to genes, respectively. In vitro and in vivo genetic screens to decipher these networks are resource-intensive, limiting the throughput of samples that can be analyzed. In this application note, we provide an R package we call Genetic inteRaction and EssenTiality neTwork mApper (GRETTA). GRETTA is an accessible tool for in silico genetic interaction screens and essentiality network analyses using publicly available data, requiring only basic R programming knowledge. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package, GRETTA, is licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 and freely available at https://github.com/ytakemon/GRETTA and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6940757, with documentation and tutorial. A Singularity container is also available at https://cloud.sylabs.io/library/ytakemon/gretta/gretta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207