MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380874121 · doi:10.3138/ctr.119.012

New-Play Development

2004· article· en· W4380874121 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Augusto Baal, Legislative Theatre

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaturgyPoliticsMeaning (existential)Political theatrePerforming artsAestheticsSociologyTransformative learningParliamentMedia studiesFacilitatorLawPolitical scienceArtVisual artsPedagogyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I begin with these words from Augusto Boal because, in his remarkable career as a creator and facilitator of internationally renowned theatre systems (the Theatre of the Oppressed and Legislative Theatre) and in his profound work as a mentor and motivator of teachers, actors, social workers and workers in numerous fields and countries, he has, above all, taught us the value of happiness in troubled times. Boal’s vision and practices have emerged out of the most difficult possible political circumstances. He was tortured under the military dictatorship in his native Brazil, and as an exile, despite the struggles of language barriers, he managed to create revolutionary and subversive ways of using theatre to animate issues and individual lives, before returning to Brazil to become, of all things, a Vereador, a member of Parliament. And, amazingly, he continued to use theatre to animate the political and cultural concerns of his constituents. At the core of Boal’s dramaturgy is the dual meaning of the verb “to act”: to perform and to take action (Boal 20).AIongside this, Boal’s work teaches us the dual meaning of the word “play”: the written creation, often at the origin of a performance, and the transformative act of creation that animates this written work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicTheatre and Performance Studies→French-language works237,207→