Pre‐stroke chronic cerebrovascular disease is a major determinant for response to structured cognitive rehabilitation following acute ischemic strokes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Post Stroke Cognitive Impairment (PSCI) is seen in 40‐60% of patients with ischemic strokes. Response of patients with PSCI to structured cognitive rehabilitation is not clearly understood. We evaluated baseline variables that predict response to an eight‐week non‐pharmacological intervention among patients with mild strokes and compared the responses to non‐pharmacological intervention among acute stroke patients with and without chronic cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Method 139 ischemic stroke survivors were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Singapore. All patients underwent an eight‐week structured group cognitive rehabilitation programme (Figure 1). Baseline, immediate post‐intervention (Immediate‐PI) and 6‐month post intervention (6‐month‐PI) global cognitive and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Dementia‐Quality of Life (DemQOL). Regression analyses evaluated the influence of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes. Result The mean age of subjects were 63.6 (±9.66) with 64.4% males. Baseline MoCA and DemQOL scores were 23.30 (±3.05) and 79.16 (±14.80). At Immediate‐PI, patients with more past strokes (p = 0.033) and severe white matter hyperintensities (WMH) (p = 0.048), benefited less on global cognitive outcome (Table 1). Male patients (p = 0.074) and patients with more severe WMH (p = 0.048) benefited less on QOL outcome (Table 2). At 6‐month‐PI, patients with microhemorrhages in the deep region (p = 0.002) were less likely to sustain cognitive improvement. With every past stroke experienced, patients were less likely to experience an improvement in MoCA score Immediate‐PI (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 0.980‐4.813, p = 0.056). with severe WMH were less likely to experience an improvement in MoCA scores Immediate‐PI compared to baseline (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.04‐4.38, p = 0.039). Finally, patients with microhemorrhages in the deep region were less likely to retain the improvements in MoCA at 6‐month‐PI (OR = 19.93, 95% CI: 1.04‐384, p = 0.047) Conclusion Pre‐stroke CVD were associated with worse cognitive and QoL outcomes post cognitive rehabilitation. Understanding factors that result in poor response to rehabilitation will allow clinicians to better select stroke survivors for cognitive rehabilitation. Future research could build on these findings and allocate more resources to these at‐risk groups for post‐stroke care, therefore reducing the global burden of stroke and ensuring a better QOL for stroke survivors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".