MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380876955 · doi:10.17483/2368-6669.1379

Nursing Students Desire to Belong in Online Learning Environments. Part 1: A Mixed-Methods Study

2023· article· en· W4380876955 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Janet Montague, Roya Haghiri‐Vijeh, Joyce Tsui, Michelle Connell, Lynda Atack

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmière · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsCentennial CollegeCanadian Nurses Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DeclarationOnline learningPandemicNurse education2019-20 coronavirus outbreakNursingPsychologyMedical educationMedicineComputer scienceMultimediaVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In early 2020, due to the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, many educational institutions significantly modified their learning environments from in-person classrooms to online delivery to ensure the continuity of education and limit the spread of the virus. Understanding how undergraduate nursing students experience belonging during this drastic shift to online learning is an area of inquiry that has a limited amount of research. Purpose of the Study: The goal of this study was to describe nursing students’ sense of belonging in an online learning environment as well as identify strategies and supports to foster their sense of belonging. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design with two phases was used for this study. In phase 1, the focus of this paper, we used a mixed-methods approach. The quantitative component consisted of an online survey and the qualitative component was the three open-ended questions included as part of the survey. Participants were third-year nursing students from a collaborative nursing degree program who had recently transitioned from the college to the university site and were currently taking all courses online as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: This paper reports on phase 1 of the study conducted in April 2021. The survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the three open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic analysis. Conclusions: As more educational institutions continue with online courses during the pandemic and post-pandemic, the findings from this study will provide valuable information as to the factors that foster or hinder nursing students’ sense of belonging in an online learning environment. These findings will also assist in contributing to the development of creative teaching modalities and pedagogies which can help to enhance the quality of student learning experiences and their sense of belonging in online learning environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.559
Teacher spread0.458 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmièreSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207