Longitudinal associations of emergent and persistent affective dysregulation symptoms with incident dementia in dementia‐free older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are risk factors for dementia. Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) is a neurobehavioral syndrome that refines NPS assessment to improve dementia prognostication by identifying later‐life emergent and persistent NPS specifically as the at‐risk group. Affective dysregulation contributes to dementia risk and is an MBI domain characterized by the inability to regulate emotions. Here, we investigate the longitudinal association of MBI‐affective dysregulation with incident dementia in dementia‐free older adults from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Centre (NACC). Method NACC participants with no history of psychiatric, neurological, or neurodevelopmental disorders were included. MBI‐affective dysregulation status was determined based on Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) depression, anxiety, and elation scores at two consecutive visits. The comparator group involved participants with no NPS prior to dementia. Participants with dementia at baseline were excluded from the study. Kaplan‐Meier curves of dementia‐free survival over ten years were generated for MBI‐affective dysregulation versus no NPS. Cox proportional hazard models were implemented to assess the risk of dementia, adjusted for age, sex, years of education, race, APOE e4 status, and clinical cognitive diagnosis. Potential interactions were further explored for relevant model covariates. Result The final sample consisted of 3,446 participants with no NPS (mean age 73.1; 63.0% female), and 1,156 with MBI‐affective dysregulation (mean age 75.1; 53.9% female). MBI‐affective dysregulation was associated with lower chance of dementia‐free survival (log rank, p<0.001) and 1.67 times greater risk of dementia compared to no NPS (CI:1.4‐2, p<0.001). Moderation analysis revealed that in participants with normal cognition (NC), those with MBI‐affective dysregulation were at 2.56 times greater risk of dementia than those with no NPS (CI:1.87‐3.49, p<0.001). In mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the risk associated with MBI‐affective dysregulation was 1.4 times greater than no NPS (CI:1.14‐1.72, p = 0.02). Conclusion The emergence of persistent affective dysregulation symptoms in dementia‐free older adults is associated with substantial risk for dementia. When emerging in individuals with NC, these persistent affective symptoms represent a greater risk compared to those with no NPS, compared to emergence of these symptoms in MCI. MBI‐affective dysregulation is an important risk factor for dementia and should be considered in clinical assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".