Neuropsychiatric symptom progression in predementia frontotemporal dementia mutation carriers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) often occur during the prodromal stage of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), as evidenced by the presence of early psychiatric diagnosis in approximately 50% of bvFTD patients prior to their dementia diagnosis. We hypothesized that carriers of mutations in progranulin (GRN+), chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72+) and microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT+) have increased baseline burden and rates of progression of NPS compared to non‐carrier individuals prior to onset of dementia symptoms based on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. Method Participants were recruited through the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) Study. NPS were assessed with Neuropsychiatric Inventory‐Questionnaire (NPI‐Q), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), Social Behaviour Checklist (SBOCL), and Behavioral Inhibition Scale (BIS) annually for up to five years. We selected participants with CDR scores of 0 and 0.5. If a participant’s CDR changed to above 0.5 during the follow‐up, we only analyzed observations collected before the conversion. We used mixed effects models to compare the baseline burden and the longitudinal progression of NPS measures between carriers and controls, adjusted for baseline age, sex, education, and baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. Result We analyzed data from 607 participants (111 C9orf72+, 47 GRN+, 67 MAPT+ and 382 non‐carrier controls). There were no significant group differences in baseline demographic features, except that MAPT+ was significantly younger than other groups (average age: C9orf72+ = 45, GRN+ = 53, MAPT+ = 41, controls = 54). Baseline NPS scores were not significantly different between carriers and controls, except that C9orf72+ had significantly lower GDS compared to controls (p = 0.002). Longitudinally, GRN+ (p = 0.02) and MAPT+ (p = 0.009) had significantly higher rates of NPI‐Q increases compared to controls, while the progression of NPI‐Q in C9orf72+ was comparable to controls. The rates of GDS, IRI, SBOCL and BIS progression were not significantly different between carriers and controls. Conclusion Prior to the onset of dementia, GRN+ and MAPT+ have a faster progression of NPS, as measured by NPI‐Q, compared to controls. Future work will investigate whether different mutation carriers are affected by specific type/cluster of symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".