MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380883751 · doi:10.1002/alz.060981

Determining whether sex and zygosity modulates the association between ApoE4 and psychosis in a neuropathologically‐confirmed Alzheimer’s disease cohort

2023· article· en· W4380883751 on OpenAlexaff
Corinne E. Fischer, Mila Valcic, Julia Kim, Luis Fornazzari, Nathan W. Churchill, Tom A. Schweizer, David G. Muñoz

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsCanadian University Music SocietyUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosisCohortApolipoprotein EZygosityInternal medicineMedicinePsychologyDementiaAlzheimer's diseaseLogistic regressionDiseasePsychiatryOncologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Individuals with the APOE ε4 allele (ApoE4) have an increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to individuals with the more common ε2 or ε3 alleles. Previous work by our group found that female ApoE4 homozygotes with Lewy body (LB) pathology were more likely to experience psychosis compared to female ApoE4 non‐carriers, whereas in males there was no dose‐dependent difference (Kim et al., 2017). The objective of this study was to refine our previous findings by adjusting for covariates (age, education, MMSE scores). Method The patient cohort was obtained from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC). Demographics, APOE genotype, LB pathology, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) data was gathered in individuals with neuropathologically‐confirmed AD (n = 1,241). Patients were considered psychotic if they scored positively for delusions and/or hallucinations on the NPI. Two cohorts were extracted, those with LB pathology (LB(+)) and those without (LB(‐)). Within each cohort, patients were classified as E4(‐), E4, or E44 based on the number of APOE ε4 alleles they carried (0, 1, 2, respectively), and stratified by sex. Binary logistic regression was used to predict the relationship between ApoE4 status and sex on presence of psychosis. Result In the LB(+) group, female ApoE4 homozygotes were significantly more likely to experience psychosis compared to female ApoE4 non‐carriers (p = .003). The significant effect remained after adjusting for covariates (p = .027). There was no significant association between ApoE4 and presence of psychosis in males. In the LB(‐) group, there was no significant association between ApoE4 and presence of psychosis in either sex. There was no significant effect in female nor male ApoE4 heterozygotes, with or without LB pathology. Conclusion Sex and zygosity modulate the effect of ApoE4 on psychosis in a cohort of neuropathologically‐confirmed AD patients, specifically, that the effect of having 2 ApoE4 alleles on presence of psychosis is limited to female ApoE4 homozygotes with LB pathology. These findings reveal a cohort of AD patients that appear to be particularly vulnerable to developing psychosis. References: Kim, J., Fischer, C.E., Schweizer, T.A., & Munoz, D.G. (2017). Gender and pathology‐specific effect of Apolipoprotein E genotype on psychosis in Alzheimer’s disease. Current Alzheimer Research, 14(8), 834‐840.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→