MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380884005 · doi:10.1002/alz.062692

Mild behavioral impairment as an indicator of early dementia neurodegeneration: Evidence from structural neuroimaging

2023· article· en· W4380884005 on OpenAlexaff
Dylan X. Guan, Tanaeem Rehman, Santhosh Nathan, Romella Durrani, Eric E. Smith, Zahinoor Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntorhinal cortexDementiaPsychologyNeuroimagingInsulaGrey matterFusiform gyrusClinical Dementia RatingPosterior cingulateAnterior cingulate cortexAudiologyVoxel-based morphometryRegion of interestCognitionPsychiatryHippocampusMedicineNeuroscienceCognitive impairmentMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) refers to the de novo emergence of persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults and has been associated with cognitive decline and incident dementia. The purpose of this study was to identify the structural neural correlates of MBI using a hypothesis‐driven region‐of‐interest (ROI) approach. Method The study cohort consisted of 744 participants (60.3% female; mean and SD of age = 71.0 ± 9.7 years; mean and SD of education: 15.8 ± 5.3 years) without dementia from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Centre dataset. Structural T1‐weighted images for each participant were processed and segmented using FreeSurfer and then normalized by age, sex, intracranial volume, scanner characteristics, and image quality to generate adjusted measures of grey matter volume (GMV) for each ROI. Our primary ROIs included five regions, each representing one Braak stage: entorhinal cortex (stage I), hippocampus (stage II), fusiform gyrus (stage III), inferior temporal cortex (stage IV), and frontal pole (stage V). We also included three hippocampal subfields (CA1, CA3, CA4) and four ROIs commonly associated with various psychiatric disorders (amygdala, insula, anterior cingulate, prefrontal cortex) as a secondary analysis. All ROIs are anatomically highlighted in Figure 1. Participants were classified as MBI+ if they presented with MBI symptoms derived from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire for two consecutive visits one year apart. Logistic regressions adjusting for cognitive diagnosis (cognitively normal, n = 568; mild cognitive impairment, n = 176) were used to model the relationship between ROI GMV (predictor) and MBI status (outcome). Result As shown in Table 1, lower GMV in early Braak stage ROIs (entorhinal cortex and hippocampus) was associated with MBI+ status. This trend was maintained for all hippocampal subfield ROIs. However, mid‐late Braak stage ROI (fusiform gyrus, inferior temporal cortex, frontal pole) GMVs were not associated with MBI status. For psychiatric disorder ROIs, lower GMV in only the amygdala was associated with MBI+ status. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that the presence of MBI may implicate neurodegeneration in regions linked to early‐stage dementia. Furthermore, this explicitly identifies MBI as a neurodegenerative marker sharing few neuroanatomical correlates with psychiatric disorders, despite their clinical manifestations. aging after age 90.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→