MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380884044 · doi:10.1002/alz.068247

Hypogyrification in midlife women with surgical menopause, a population at risk for late life Alzheimer’s

2023· article· en· W4380884044 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laura Gravelsins, Alana Brown, Anne Almey, Nicole Gervais, Annie Duchesne, Jenny Rieck, Rebekah Reuben, Laurice Karkaby, Mateja Perović, Suzanne Tyson Witt, Elisabeth Classon, Nina Lykke, Elvar Theodorsson, Jan Ernerudh, Elisabeth Åvall Lundqvist, Preben Kjølhede, India Morrison, Giovanni Novembre, Maria Engström, Marcus Q. Bernardini, William D. Foulkes, Natasha Rajah, Cheryl L. Grady, Gillian Einstein

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaBaycrest HospitalDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGyrificationPsychologyMenopausePopulationMemory spanMedicineInternal medicineWorking memoryAudiologyNeuroscienceCerebral cortexCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Women with early ovarian hormone deprivation due to bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy (BSO; ovarian and fallopian tube removal) are at risk for later life Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but estradiol therapy (ET) may be protective (Rocca et al., 2007). Working memory (WM), temporarily maintaining and manipulating information in mind, depends on structural integrity of fronto‐parietal brain regions (Burzynska et al., 2012). WM declines have been observed in midlife women with BSO not taking ET (Gervais et al., 2020), however, structural brain–WM relationships in this midlife population remain unexplored. This study aimed to: 1) Investigate fronto‐parietal cortical thickness and gyrification (folding) changes in younger women after early BSO and their relationship to WM, and 2) Explore whether ET ameliorates these changes. Method Women with early BSO taking ET (BSO+ET: M±SDage = 45±5.1; n = 26), or not taking ET (BSO: M±SDage = 46±5.0y; n = 26) were compared to premenopausal, age‐matched controls (AMC: M±SDage = 44±2.9y; n = 42) from Toronto and Montreal, Canada, and Linköping, Sweden. T1‐weighted scans were acquired on Siemens Prisma/Philips 3T scanners. WM was measured using Digit Span Backwards (Wechsler, 1945) maximum span and Digit Ordering Task (Petrides et al., 1993) errors. Average cortical thickness and gyrification of fronto‐parietal regions were calculated from CIVET (Ad‐Dab’bagh et al. 2005), adjusting for scanner and past cancer treatment. Result Linear models showed no group differences in cortical thickness or WM. However, they showed BSO had significant hypogyrification (reduced cortical folding) in the supplementary motor area (SMA), part of the posterior prefrontal cortex, compared to AMC (adjusted for brain volume; FDR‐corrected p = 0.028). BSO+ET had intermediate SMA gyrification, and did not differ from either group. SMA gyrification was unrelated to WM, and gyrification–WM relationships did not differ by group. Conclusion We found SMA hypogyrification in younger women with BSO compared to AMC and BSO+ET. The SMA supports WM manipulation and is an early area affected by age‐related gyrification declines (Madan, 2021). Moreover, hypogyrification may reflect reduced brain connectivity, and gyrification globally declines with AD severity (Liu et al., 2012). Although SMA hypogyrification in women with BSO was unrelated to WM, it may serve as an early sign of later life cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207