MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380884052 · doi:10.1002/alz.061536

Hypothalamic volumes predict sleep dysfunction in genetic frontotemporal dementia

2023· article· en· W4380884052 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Best, Martina Bocchetta, Jonathan D. Rohrer, James B. Rowe, Barbara Borroni, Daniela Galimberti, Pietro Tiraboschi, Mario Masellis, Maria Carmela Trataglia, Elizabeth Finger, John C. van Swieten, Harro Seelaar, Lize C. Jiskoot, Sandro Sorbi, Christopher Butler, Caroline Graff, Alexander Gerhard, Tobias Langheinrich, Robert Laforce, Raquel Sánchez‐Valle, Alexandre de Mendonça, Fermín Moreno, Matthis Synofzik, Rik Vandenberghe, Isabelle Le Ber, Johannes Levin, Adrian Danek, Markus Otto, Florence Pasquier, Isabel Santana, Matthias L. Schroeter, Anne M. Remes, Maria Landqvist Waldö, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg, Jørgen E. Nielsen, Tim Van Langenhove, M. Mallar Chakravarty, Simon Ducharme

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalWestern UniversityOccupational Cancer Research CentreSunnybrook HospitalMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaAtrophyDementiaPsychologyNeuroscienceAudiologyInternal medicineMedicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Sleep dysfunction is common in neurodegenerative disorders, however, its neural correlates, remain poorly characterized in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Atrophy in two hypothalamic nuclei, the suprachiasmatic nucleus and the lateral hypothalamic area, important for sleep regulation, may be related to this dysfunction. Thus, we examined changes in cerebral and hypothalamic structure across the lifespan in genetic FTD and their relations to measures of sleep dysfunction. Method Data was retrieved from the Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative (GENFI). T1‐weighted structural MRI images and scores on the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory‐Revised (CBI‐R) sleep subscale were obtained from subjects with mutations causative of FTD (n = 491, scan number = 1029) and healthy controls (n = 321, scan number = 739). MRI images were processed for cortical thickness using CIVET 2.1 and hypothalamic volumes using a deep learning segmentation algorithm (Billot et al., NeuroImage 2020). Using linear mixed‐effects models, we examined changes in sleep dysfunction, vertex‐wise differences in cortical thickness, and volumetric changes in hypothalamic regions in mutation carriers compared to controls. Further, using linear mixed‐effects models, we examined associations between cortical and hypothalamic atrophy and changes in the CBI‐R sleep subscale while controlling for age, sex, scanning site, and disease severity based on the MMSE. Result Mutation carriers showed greater sleep dysfunction across the lifespan, and this increased closer to the predicted onset of symptoms, compared to controls (p < 0.01), with MAPT carriers having greater dysfunction overall (figure 1). All mutation carriers showed patterns of cortical thinning (figure 2) commensurate with the literature (p < 0.05, FDR corrected). Further, cortical thinning in frontal and parietal regions were associated with greater sleep disturbance in C9orf72 and GRN mutation carriers (p < 0.05, FDR corrected) (figure 3). Lastly, MAPT mutation carriers showed consistently significant hypothalamic volume loss across the lifespan (figure 4) (p < 0.01) and reduced hypothalamic volumes were related to increased sleep dysfunction (p < 0.05) (Figure 5). Conclusion These findings suggest that while cortical thinning in C9orf72 and GRN carriers non‐specifically correlate with increased sleep dysfunction, the increased sleep dysfunction observed in MAPT carriers may be attributable to increased hypothalamic atrophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207