FLAIR MRI biomarkers of the Normal‐Appearing Brain Matter (NABM) are related to APOE‐4 status and CSF markers Aβ42 and Tau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Reduced amyloid‐beta‐42 (Aβ42) and elevated total tau (t‐tau) protein concentrations in the CSF are characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology [1]. Aβ42 contributes to extracellular plaque formation between neurons [2]. The total level of tau, a microtubule‐stabilizer in neuron axons [3], is associated with neuronal death [1]. Additionally, presence of ApoE4 (ε4) alleles is an established identifier for increased risk of AD [4]. Non‐invasive imaging‐based correlates of the CSF markers are lacking. This study examines correlations of novel FLAIR texture, intensity, and volume biomarkers, along with white matter lesion (WML) burden, with Aβ42, t‐tau, and ε4 status. Method FLAIR volumes (n = 4044) from the ADNI database were used for analysis with CSF biomarkers. A subset (n = 921) was used for ε4 analysis based on available data. Normal‐appearing brain matter (NABM) was obtained by removing CSF and WML. Macrostructural damage (MAD), microstructural damage (MID), and integrity (MII) texture biomarkers [5] were extracted from each NABM volume (Fig. 1), along with median intensity, NABM/ICV ratio, and normalized WML volume [5]. Relationships between FLAIR biomarkers and AD markers were described using parametric statistical analyses. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Result All FLAIR biomarkers were statistically significantly correlated with CSF Aβ42 levels. All features except MID and WML burden were significantly correlated with CSF t‐tau levels (Table 1). MAD, MID, and WML burden showed negative correlations with Aβ42, while MAD showed a positive correlation with t‐tau. Opposite trends were seen with MII, intensity, and NABM/ICV (Fig. 2). Significant differences between groups without and with one ε4 allele were found in all FLAIR biomarkers except WML burden. Significant differences in MAD, MII and NABM/ICV were found between groups with one and two ε4 alleles (Table 2). Conclusion FLAIR biomarkers were inversely associated with CSF Aβ42 concentrations, suggesting they may be surrogate markers of Aβ plaque formation. They were associated with CSF t‐tau concentrations, suggesting they could also be indicators of GM degeneration and neuronal death. They could also be indicators for patients at increased risk of AD, as they demonstrated significant differences with the presence of ε4. Further longitudinal studies are required to establish the exact mechanism of neurodegeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".