MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380884110 · doi:10.1002/alz.066468

Carotid pulse wave velocity measured using a fast single‐slice oblique‐sagittal phase‐contrast MRI is associated with cognitive impairment

2023· article· en· W4380884110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jianing Tang, Soroush Heidari Pahlavian, Elizabeth Joe, Helena C. Chui, Lirong Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse wave velocitySagittal planeArterial stiffnessMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingCommon carotid arteryMontreal Cognitive AssessmentNuclear medicineRadiologyCardiologyCarotid arteriesInternal medicineCognitive impairmentBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Arterial stiffness is one of the earliest markers of vascular dysfunction1. Elevated arterial stiffness leads to the transmission of excessive pulsations into the downstream microvasculature, which may be linked to cognitive impairment in aged individuals. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an established surrogate of arterial stiffness. To date, PWV measurement at carotid arteries or above has been still limited. Previous work has introduced a fast MRI method to measure carotid PWV (cPWV) using single‐slice oblique‐sagittal phase‐contrast MRI (OS PC‐MRI)3. In this study, we evaluated the association between cPWV and cognitive impairment in an aged group. Method The MRI experiments were conducted on Siemens Prisma 3T MRI scanner. A 2min TOF MRI was performed to localize carotid arteries including CCA and ICA. The 3D MR angiogram was reformatted to determine an oblique slice to maximally cover both CCA and ICA (Figure 1a). A single‐slice retrospectively gated 2D OS PC‐MRI with a single in‐plane velocity encoding (CCA to ICA) (Venc = 80cm/s, temporal resolution = 14.22ms) was performed to simultaneously acquire blood velocity waveforms at each location along the CCA‐ICA segment. cPWV was calculated as the inverse slope of the line fitted to the transit time versus distance along the vessel (Figure 1b). 15 elderly participants (age: 71.4 ± 8.5 years) were enrolled in this study. Each participant underwent cognitive assessments including CDR and 13 out of 15 were conducted the MoCA. Result There was a significant difference (p = 0.0496) in cPWV between the participants with normal cognition (CDR = 0) and cognition impairment (CDR> = 0.5). Figure 3 shows the scatter plot of cPWV vs. MoCA. Overall, cPWV increased with lower MoCA. However, there was no significance (r = ‐0.5294, p = 0.0767) obtained between cPWV and MoCA given a small sample size and the presence of a suspicious data point indicated by a green circle in Figure 3. After excluding this potential outlier, a significant negative correlation between cPWV and MoCA was obtained (r = ‐0.8113, p = 0.0014). Conclusion The pilot study demonstrates that increased cPWV is associated with cognitive impairment, suggesting cPWV measured using 2D OS PC‐MRI could be an imaging marker for cognitive impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention→French-language works237,207→