A longitudinal analysis of cerebral blood flow changes in genetic frontotemporal Dementia: Results from genfi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Mutations in the C9orf72, GRN, or MAPT genes are the most prevalent genetic causes of familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD). In a cross‐sectional study of genetic FTD, lower CBF was observed in presymptomatic FTD mutation carriers vs. controls from the same families in 6 regions of interest: the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex, the left medial temporal gyrus, the left and right insulae, and the left and right supramarginal gyri (Mutsaerts et. al. 2019). However, there have been no studies to date that identify longitudinal changes in CBF between FTD genetic subgroups (both presymptomatic and symptomatic) compared to controls. Method We compared longitudinal changes in CBF, as measured by ASL‐MRI, in 317 FTD mutation carriers (118 C9orf72, 141 GRN, and 58 MAPT) vs. 261 non‐carrier controls from the Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI). Linear mixed effects models tested the main effect of carrier status, and its interaction with age, along with covariates of age, sex, site‐of‐scan against each subject’s mean regional cerebral blood flow within the regions of interest from Mutsaerts et al. (2019). Family membership was a random intercept in the model to control for similar genetic and environmental backgrounds. Result Differences between genetic subsets of FTD were apparent, with GRN carriers preferentially experiencing decreases within the salience network regions while MAPT carriers expressed differences within the left medial temporal gyrus and bilateral anterior cingulate gyrus. C9orf72 carriers only saw a decrease in CBF within the left insula. Significant interactions between carrier status and age were exclusively evident in MAPT carriers across all regions of interest. Conclusion Differentiating CBF signatures were found to exist between the genetic FTD subgroups, with the most prominent changes being seen in GRN and MAPT subsets. Evidence continues to mount that CBF may be a viable biomarker in the earlier detection and delineation of genetic FTD variants. References: Mutsaerts, H. J. M. M. et al. Cerebral perfusion changes in presymptomatic genetic frontotemporal dementia: a GENFI study. Brain 142, awz039 (2019).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".