MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380884118 · doi:10.1002/alz.067382

Unique combinations of shape morphometric features improves discriminability of ftld phenotypes

2023· article· en· W4380884118 on OpenAlexaff
Jane Stocks, Karteek Popuri, Mirza Faisal Beg, Yann Cobigo, Howard J. Rosen, Lei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological diseases and metabolism
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgressive supranuclear palsyPrimary progressive aphasiaFrontotemporal lobar degenerationFrontotemporal dementiaMedicinePhenotypePrincipal component analysisPathologyPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceBiologyGeneticsDiseaseDementiaComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is associated with diverse clinical phenotypes underlain by multiple disease pathologies and genetic mutations. As such, traditional structural MRI analyses lack sensitivity and specificity for discriminating FTLD syndromes. Here, we use data‐driven methods to extract a concise set of MRI‐derived shape morphometric features and examine the discriminatory capability of their unique combinations in four FTLD clinical phenotypes. Method 190 patients with sporadic or familial FTLD spectrum disorders (i.e., behavioral variant (bvFTD, n = 107), non‐fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA, n = 27), semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA, n = 12) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP, n = 44)) and 27 controls without pathogenic mutations from the ALLFTD cohort were evaluated. MRI data were preprocessed with FreeSurfer software and four cortical measures were extracted and indexed to a normalized surface atlas: cortical thickness (CT), surface area (SA), surface curvature (SC) and jacobian white matter surface metric distortion (JW). For all phenotypes, each shape feature was contrasted with controls using linear models adjusted for age and gender. Principal component analysis (PCA) was then applied to each individual structural measure and the discriminatory power based on individual and combined measures was assessed using logistic regression and 10‐fold cross‐validation. Result Figure 1 displays FDR‐corrected T‐scores of differences from controls in each morphometric feature in bvFTD. Results reveal complementary patterns of CT, SA, SC and JW for each phenotype, with greatest differences observed in CT across groups. In Figure 2, we display the features derived from the PCA, weighted by eigenvector coefficients, in bvFTD. In Figures 3‐6, receiver operating characteristic curves for individual and combined measures alongside areas under the curve (AUCs) are shown for each phenotype. In bvFTD, nfvPPA and PSP, the superior model included CT and SC at AUCs of 88.3, 87, and 78.6, respectively. For svPPA, the superior model included CT, SC and JW at an AUC of 85.6. Conclusion Integrating additional MRI‐derived surface morphometric features improved classification performance in all FTLD phenotypes. The principal component analysis‐based approach indicated distinct brain regions contribute to discrimination for each shape feature, suggesting they may reflect unique aspects of neurodegeneration across groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicNeurological diseases and metabolismFrench-language works237,207