MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380893821 · doi:10.1002/alz.064935

Dementia associated disorders, cognitive impairment and impact on social roles activities and participation: Patient centric impact

2023· article· en· W4380893821 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sophia Peraza‐Bonilla, Olivia Kaczmarek, Steven Baek, Avtej Sethi, Barbara Bumstead, Myassar Zarif, Mark Gudesblatt

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaCognitionAffect (linguistics)Quality of life (healthcare)PsychologyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineClinical psychologyCognitive impairmentGerontologyPsychiatryDiseaseInternal medicinePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Dementia associated diseases (DAD) refers to several clinical conditions that are characterized by progressive cognitive impairment that interferes with an individual’s ability to function independently. Cognitive impairments (CI) can vary in degree and combination across multiple cognitive domains (CD) that routine care or tests (MMSE, MOCA) might not adequately identify. Therefore, a clinician may not recognize these varied types of CI or change in CD scores effectively. Enhanced recognition of patient centric CI in routine care can be accomplished improved analytics by incorporating a validated, examiner independent computerized cognitive assessment battery (CAB‐NT). Patient self‐reported outcome measures (PRO) are concurrently incorporated with CAB‐NT to gauge associated disability progression. Ability and participation in social roles and activities and communication ability can adversely affect quality of life (QoL) for people with Dementia associated diseases (PwDAD) and are likely related to CI and other factors. Method Retrospective review of consecutive PwDAD who completed both CAB‐NT and PRO (SSRA, APSRA, and C‐SF) on the same day in the course of routine care. CAB‐NT included 7 cognitive domains: memory (Mem), executive function (Exe), attention (Att), information processing speed (Inf), visual spatial (Vis), verbal function (Ver), motor skills (Mot) as well as a global cognitive summary score (GCS). Results 312 PwDaD, 64.74% female, average age 66 +/‐ 17 years. Simple linear regression analyses were performed with significant correlations (p = <0.05): CAB‐NT vs SSRA: GCS r = 0.2, Exe r = 0.3, Mot r = 0.2, and Att r = 0.3. CAB‐NT vs APSRA: Exe r = 0.3, Att r = 0.2. CAB‐NT vs C‐SF: Exe r = 0.2. Conclusion Social roles and communication in PwDAD are most impacted by CI associated with executive functioning and attention. Impairment in these domains are associated with increased difficulty for PwDaD to effectively interact with others and may lead to reduced QoL for these patients. Identifying the degree and combination of such CI precisely might allow for early and effective targeted proactive behavioral and/or medicinal intervention to improve QOL of these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→