The viscoplastic circular hydraulic jump
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine theoretically the spread of a jet impacting on a circular disk and the hydraulic jump of a viscoplastic fluid of the Herschel–Bulkley type. The depth-averaging approach is employed in the supercritical region, and the subcritical flow is assumed to be inertialess of the lubrication type. The jump is treated as a shock, where the balance of mass and momentum is established in the radial direction, including the effect of surface tension across the jump. We show that, in contrast to the Newtonian jet, which requires separate formulations in the developing-boundary layer and fully viscous layers, the supercritical formulation for the fully yielded and pseudo-plug layers is uniformly valid between the impingement zone and the jump. Consequently, a viscoplastic jet does not experience the discontinuity in the film height, pseudo-plug layer velocity gradient, and shear stress, exhibited by a Newtonian film at the transition location. The jump is found to occur closer to impingement, with growing height, as the yield stress increases; the subcritical region becomes invaded by the pseudo-plug layer. The viscosity does not influence sensibly the jump location and height except for small yield stress; only the yielded-layer is found to remain sensitive to the power-law rheology for any yield stress. In particular, shear thickening can cause the fully yielded layer to drop in height despite the jump in the film surface. We also find that the jump would not occur if the disk was smaller than a critical size, but the yield stress tends to enhance the formation of the jump compared to a Newtonian jet. We show that an almost constant local downstream Froude number also exists for a viscoplastic fluid. Finally, our results reduce to the limiting cases of Bingham, power-law, and Newtonian fluids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".