Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this issue, three different contributors discuss how our perceptions of theatre and of the world are governed by the organization of bodies in space, whether geographic, scenographic or imaginary. Guy Sprung opens with an interesting overview of his company’s experience as the only North American company from north of the Mexican border participating in the Cairo International Festival for Experimental Theatre in early September of this year. Through his discussion of his initial impressions of Cairo, of the organization of the festival and of the plays presented by some of the Arab companies present, Sprung makes it clear that a shift in geographical space cannot help but make one question the dominant perspectives of one’s own society. In contrast, he also notes how recent colonial history inflects the performance choices of many of the companies present; an interesting observation that might include his own choice to produce Beckett’s Fin de Partie/Endgame as the only Canadian entry in the Festival. In the end however, the question of control of space in the turbulent Middle East and its effects on everyday life in the region are foremost in his mind as he finds himself watching CNN coverage of the events of 11 September in an Arab cafe, where most of his fellow observers consider the Arab world, and not New York, to be the centre of their cultural space and cultural history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.095 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".