Bibliographic record
Abstract
The suitcase is a provocation. First, to a group of young people in Tokyo and their teacher, Fumiko Ishioka, at the Tokyo Holocaust Education Resource Centre; then to Karen Levine, producer at the CBC; and later, to Allen MacInnis, artistic director, and Emil Sher, playwright, at the Lorraine Kimsa Theatre for Young People (LKTYP) in Toronto. Sher’s new script (2006) is an adaptation of Levine’s book Hana’s Suitcase (2002) and is a superb piece of children’s theatre. Sent from the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in 2000 as an artefact for Ishioka’s new Holocaust Centre, the suitcase prompted questions: “Who was Hana?” “Where did she come from?” “What happened to her?” (Levine 5). Urged on by the children from Tokyo, Ishioka embarked on a journey across Europe to solve the mystery of Hana’s suitcase, a search that ended with the discovery that Hana’s only sibling, George, had survived the war and was living right here in Canada. MacInnis notes, “What drew me to Hana’s Suitcase and made me want to stage a play version is the wonder that Hana dreamed of being a teacher and, even though she perished at the hands of the Nazis, her story sixty years later is teaching children” (3). Since its publication, Hana’s Suitcase has been translated into over thirty languages and has won more than twenty awards internationally. In Canada, in addition to its two sold-out runs at the LKTYP, Hana’s Suitcase has played at the Citadel Theatre in Edmonton and the Manitoba Theatre for Young People. Sher’s adaptation held its American premiere at St. Louis’s Metro and was mounted at First Stage Children’s Theatre in Milwaukee this fall. During the 2007—8 season, the play will also tour to the Green Thumb Theatre in Vancouver; to Geordie Productions in Montreal, and back to Edmonton’s Citadel Theatre for a return engagement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".