MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380929040 · doi:10.3138/ctr.104.010

<i>A Modo Suo (A Fable):</i> A Production History

2000· article· en· W4380929040 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Anna Migliarisi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamArtFablePerformance artHistoryArt historyHumanitiesVisual artsLiteratureLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tony Nardi and I recently met to discuss his second play, A Modo Suo (A Fable), written in an Italianized Calabrian dialect and published here for the first time in an English translation by Antonino Mazza. The play was first staged at Canadian Stage Company’s Theatre Upstairs on Berkeley in April and May of 1990. It was produced independently by Tony, actor Mary Long and me and co-directed by Tony and Italian commedia master Alberto Fortuzzi. It featured Tony in the central role of Raffaele; Mary Long; Frank Crudele; Dom Fiore; Lucy Filippone; and me as Linda, the daughter. While A Modo Suo (A Fable) secured substantial funding from both government and private sources, was the subject of over twenty articles and reviews and received a Dora Mavor Moore Award nomination for Best New Play in the Small Theatre Division, from a historical point of view the production is important because it provided a focus for a number of questions about the production, reception and critical evaluation of plays written in a language other than English or French that are as relevant today as they were a decade ago. The mere fact that the play was performed in Calabrese by a group of professional Equity actors in an English-language mainstream theatre in downtown Toronto rather than in a local Italian church basement by amateurs caused a stir among the English and Italian media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207