Bibliographic record
Abstract
From Antonine Maillet’s canonical La Sagouine (Les Feux Chalins, 1971) to Emma Haché’s postmodern Murmures, produced by Théâtre populaire d’Acadie (TPA) in the winter of 2006, contemporary Acadian theatre has matured and developed a sense of itself in an interrelationship with the community that is both complex and dynamic. While playwrights like Haché or Herménégilde Chiasson continue to explore aspects of Acadian history, their plays like Murmures or Pour une fois (l’Escaouette 1999–2004) interrogate the assumptions of that history and of the Acadian nationalism that has been so closely allied with a mythologized past. In the relatively short span of time since Louis J. Robichaud became the first Acadian premier of New Brunswick in 1960 and subsequently instituted a number of measures in education, language equality and economic structures that rebalanced the relationship between English and French communities in the province, cultural and identitary assertiveness of the Acadian renaissance (or “miracle” – both metaphors are heard) has seen Acadie and Acadians develop from being significantly disadvantaged to asserting economic, political and cultural power. From the earliest years, theatre has played a role in the construction of this identity, and an examination of the situation of contemporary theatre in Acadie1 in New Brunswick will make it clear that both theatre and society have moved beyond traditional nationalist narratives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".