MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380931213 · doi:10.2172/1985113

Memorandum of Understanding for the 2006 Meson Test Beam Program: The FP420 (CMS+ATLAS) Fast Timing Test

2006· report· en· W4380931213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Brandt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)Test (biology)Particle physicsMemorandumNuclear physicsPhysicsComputer sciencePolitical scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a memorandum of understanding between the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) and the University of Alberta experimenters who have committed to participate in beam tests to be carried out during the 2006 Meson Test Beam Facility program. The memorandum is intended solely for the purpose of providing a budget estimate and a work allocation for Fermilab, the funding agencies and the participating institutions. It reflects an arrangement that currently is satisfactory to the parties; however, it is recognized and anticipated that changing circumstances of the evolving research program will necessitate revisions. The parties agree to negotiate amendments to this memorandum, which will reflect such required adjustments. The experimenters require beam time at Fermilab during the 2006 Meson Test Beam Run to test charged particle detectors with very high timing resolution, σ(t) ~ 10-20 ps. The primary goal of such detectors is to measure the time-of -flight of leading (diffractively scattered) protons at the LHC (CMS and/or ATLAS) 420m from the collision point. The experimenters aim to measure at the LHC the exclusive process pp → p + H + p where H is the Higgs boson. Observation of this process, which appears feasible but difficult, will enable the Higgs boson mass to be measured with a resolution ~ 2 GeV per event, measure its spin and CP (expected to be 0++), its coupling to gg (through a top-loop in the Standard Model) and its width (if Γ(H) > ~ 3 GeV). As the cross section is expected to be small, 1 - 10 fb for Standard Model Higgs (but possibly much larger in SUSY scenarios), it is imperative to use high luminosity with many interactions per beam crossing. One of several methods of reducing pile-up background, where the two protons and the central JJ/WW/ZZ are not all from the same event, is to have precision timing on the two forward protons relative to each other. A time resolution of 20 ps will give a 6 mm ÷ √2 = 4.3 mm resolution in z(interaction), if the protons came from the same interaction. This z(pp) must match z(vertex) from the JJ/WW/ZZ event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207