MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380986988 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000034041

Interleukin-4 expression is increased in patients with tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2023· review· en· W4380986988 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jie He, Lingmeng Song, Pengcheng Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisTuberculosisPublication biasFunnel plotConfidence intervalMycobacterium tuberculosisInternal medicineStatistical significanceSubgroup analysisMEDLINEImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-4 (IL-4) is an important cytokine in the Th2 differentiation of CD4+ T cells, which modulates immune responses and participates in host defense against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the significance of IL-4 concentration in patients with tuberculosis. Data from this study will be helpful in understanding the immunological mechanisms of tuberculosis and in clinical practice. METHOD: A data search was conducted from January 1995 to October 2022 in electronic bibliographic databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity between the studies was assessed using I2 statistics. Publication bias was determined by funnel plot, and Egger's test was used to confirm the presence of publication bias. All qualified studies and statistical analyses were performed using Stata 11.0. RESULTS: Fifty-one eligible studies comprising 4317 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The results depicted a considerably increased level of serum IL-4 in patients with tuberculosis than in the controls (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.630, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.162-1.092]). However, there was no significant difference in plasma IL-4 levels between patients with TB and controls (SMD = 0.290, [95% CI, -0.430 to 1.010]). In addition, the infection status, TB focus location, drug resistance, race, research design type, and detection method divided the subjects into different subgroups for the meta-analysis. The results of the comparison of healthy controls and TB subjects showed that in the Asian population, the serum IL-4 level in patients with TB was higher than that in controls (SMD = 0.887, [95% CI, 0.202 to -1.573]) and patients with active TB as well as people with pulmonary TB showed increased serum IL-4 levels compared to controls (SMD = 0.689, [95% CI, 0.152-1.226]). In the case of the control group with latent TB, the active TB group had higher serum IL-4 levels than the control group (SMD = 0.920, [95% CI, 0.387-1.452]). CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis showed that serum IL-4 varied in healthy individuals and patients with TB. Patients with active TB may also exhibit higher IL-4 concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.038
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207