Interleukin-4 expression is increased in patients with tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interleukin-4 (IL-4) is an important cytokine in the Th2 differentiation of CD4+ T cells, which modulates immune responses and participates in host defense against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the significance of IL-4 concentration in patients with tuberculosis. Data from this study will be helpful in understanding the immunological mechanisms of tuberculosis and in clinical practice. METHOD: A data search was conducted from January 1995 to October 2022 in electronic bibliographic databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity between the studies was assessed using I2 statistics. Publication bias was determined by funnel plot, and Egger's test was used to confirm the presence of publication bias. All qualified studies and statistical analyses were performed using Stata 11.0. RESULTS: Fifty-one eligible studies comprising 4317 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The results depicted a considerably increased level of serum IL-4 in patients with tuberculosis than in the controls (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.630, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.162-1.092]). However, there was no significant difference in plasma IL-4 levels between patients with TB and controls (SMD = 0.290, [95% CI, -0.430 to 1.010]). In addition, the infection status, TB focus location, drug resistance, race, research design type, and detection method divided the subjects into different subgroups for the meta-analysis. The results of the comparison of healthy controls and TB subjects showed that in the Asian population, the serum IL-4 level in patients with TB was higher than that in controls (SMD = 0.887, [95% CI, 0.202 to -1.573]) and patients with active TB as well as people with pulmonary TB showed increased serum IL-4 levels compared to controls (SMD = 0.689, [95% CI, 0.152-1.226]). In the case of the control group with latent TB, the active TB group had higher serum IL-4 levels than the control group (SMD = 0.920, [95% CI, 0.387-1.452]). CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis showed that serum IL-4 varied in healthy individuals and patients with TB. Patients with active TB may also exhibit higher IL-4 concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".