Anti-inflammatory effects of oral cannabidiol in rat models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Background:</ns4:bold> Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive compound in cannabis, has various pharmacological advantages associated with clinical use, especially for reducing inflammatory arthritis and paw edema in animal models. This study evaluated the anti-inflammatory effects of various oral CBD doses (5-40 mg/kg) in rats after injecting 0.1 mL of carrageenan. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods:</ns4:bold> Rats were orally administered various CBD doses an hour before the carrageenan-induced inflammation to observe the anti-inflammatory effects of CBD. Paw edema was measured at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h after carrageenan induction. Following a six-hour induction of carrageenan, histological analysis employing hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed to investigate inflammatory cell infiltration at paw edema. In addition, blood samples were taken and used for cytokine detection using ELISA and bead-base assays. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results:</ns4:bold> We found that the efficacy of all oral CBD doses decreased paw edema and was comparable to or had greater efficacy than an anti-inflammatory agent (Diclofenac 10 mg/kg), especially at 2, 3, 4, and 5 h after induced paw edema. Moreover, a high dose (40 mg/kg) of CBD suppressed chemokine productions, including monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and MCP-3, compared to diclofenac and placebo. In addition, serotonin levels, a pro-inflammatory-like neurotransmitter, were drastically decreased in rats treated with either CBD or diclofenac. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions:</ns4:bold> Oral CBD is an interesting anti-inflammatory agent for use in the clinical setting. However, more information regarding drug safety and efficacy in a large population of human studies is needed. </ns4:p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | medium |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".