INVESTIGATION OF THE PATHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF HISTONES, DNA, AND NUCLEOSOMES IN A MURINE MODEL OF SEPSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Background: In sepsis, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are an important interface between innate immunity and coagulation. The major structural component of neutrophil extracellular traps is nucleosomes (DNA-histone complexes). In vitro, DNA and histones exert procoagulant/cytotoxic effects whereas nucleosomes are not harmful. However, whether DNA, histones, and/or nucleosomes exert harmful effects in vivo remain unclear. Objectives: (1) The aims of the study are to investigate the cytotoxic effects of nucleosomes ± DNase I and heparin in vitro and (2) to investigate whether DNA, histones, and/or nucleosomes are harmful when injected into healthy and septic mice. Methods : The cytotoxic effects of DNA, histones, and nucleosomes (± DNaseI or ±heparin) were assessed in HEK293 cells. Mice underwent cecal ligation and puncture or sham surgery and then received injections of DNA (8 mg/kg), histones (8.5 mg/kg), or nucleosomes at 4 and 6 h. Organs and blood were harvested at 8 h. Cell-free DNA, IL-6, thrombin-anti-thrombin, and protein C were quantified from plasma. Results:In vitro , incubation of HEK293 cells with DNaseI-treated nucleosomes reduced cell survival compared with nucleosome-treated cells, suggesting that DNaseI releases cytotoxic histones from nucleosomes. Addition of heparin to DNaseI-treated nucleosomes rescued cell death. In vivo, administration of histones to septic mice increased markers of inflammation (IL-6) and coagulation (thrombin-anti-thrombin), which was not observed in sham or septic mice administered DNA or nucleosomes. Conclusions: Our studies suggest that DNA masks the harmful effects of histones in vitro and in vivo . Although administration of histones contributed to the pathogenesis of sepsis, administration of nucleosomes or DNA was not harmful in healthy or septic mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".