MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381113004 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-bsg.186

P114 Filgotinib in ulcerative colitis: early real-world experience in Southampton

2023· article· en· W4381113004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deborah R. Taylor, David Young, Sohail Rahmany, Marion Bettey, Philip Oppong, Richard Harris, Trevor Smith, Richard Felwick, Markus Gwiggner, Fraser Cummings

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabUlcerative colitisInternal medicineInfliximabAdverse effectFaecal calprotectinNiceRetrospective cohort studyCalprotectinInflammatory bowel diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Filgotinib was licensed for use in ulcerative colitis in the UK in January 2022 and NICE approved in June 2022. We reviewed our patients treated with filgotinib following the additional measures recommended by the EMA to identify those at increased risk of side effects with JAK inhibitors. The position of filgotinib in therapeutic pathways and the ideal sequence of medications needs defining. This is a description of the real-world experience of its effectiveness and patient reported outcomes in one IBD tertiary referral centre. Methods Patients, as part of clinical care, had blood safety monitoring, adverse event recording and effectiveness measured using faecal calprotectin (FC), SCCAI and IBD-Control. Endoscopy data, where available, was collected. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted. Results All 31 patients initiated on filgotinib are included in this analysis. The mean age was 43 (SD ± 16) years, 17 were male and median disease duration was 3 (IQR 2–10) years. Disease extent (as per Montreal classification) is: E1: 3, E2: 8 and E3: 20. Four patients had previously been exposed to tofacitinib, 21 to anti-TNFα agents, 16 to vedolizumab and 7 to ustekinumab. 6 patients had not received any prior cytokine modulator drugs. 5 patients had at least one risk factor included in the EMA warning. At baseline median FC was 1037, 22 patients had SCCAI ≥6 and 11 patients were taking oral corticosteroids. of 20 patients who had endoscopic assessment at baseline, 17 had a Mayo score of ≥2. Persistence at 120 days was 65% (figure 1A). Four patients had primary non-response, two secondary loss of response and two patients stopped due to adverse events. of the 10 patients who remained on treatment and received follow up (mean 103 days), all had a clinically significant reduction in SCCAI score of ≥3 (figure 1B) and 9 had an improvement in their IBD-Control-8 subscore. 13 patients are awaiting follow-up but continue on the medication. Filgotinib was generally well tolerated, other than minor side effects including headache, pruritis and nausea. There were no venous thromboembolisms reported. Two patients underwent colectomies, both patients had prior exposure to all classes of approved biological medicines. No other serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions In this small group, that included a proportion of complex patients, filgotinib appears to be efficacious and well tolerated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207