MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381135222 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3066336/v1

Optimization of Time Dependent Fuzzy Multi-Objective Reliability Redundancy Allocation Problem for n-Stage Series Parallel System

2023· preprint· en· W4381135222 on OpenAlexaff
Satyajit De, Pratik Roy, Siddhartha Roy, Anil Bikash Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsHeritage College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationMaximizationParticle swarm optimizationSortingFuzzy logicComputer scienceRedundancy (engineering)MathematicsAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study introduces a time dependent fuzzy multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation problem (TF-MORRAP) for the $n$-stage (level) series parallel system. System reliability maximization and system cost minimization according to time by optimizing the redundant components counting at every stage of the system is the main objective of this study. This optimization is done by satisfying the entropy constraints with limited redundant components at every stage and in the whole system. The reliability and cost of every component are represented as triangular fuzzy numbers (TFN) to handle the uncertainty of input information of the system. According to time the component reliability and cost decrease by some factor of their previous existing value. This factor follows the change in the length of radius of the inverse logarithmic spiral with respect to angle which is regarded as time here. The proposed problem is analysed by using an over-speed protection system of a gas turbine. We compare the membership values of optimal solutions obtained by using two well-known techniques namely Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) and a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm called NF-MOPSO. Various performances of the algorithms are compared to solve the aforementioned problem by using some performance metrics. NF-MOPSO shows the high satisfaction level of objective functions and better performance than NSGA-II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207