MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381136670 · doi:10.1111/cpf.12843

Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular responses to the Valsalva manoeuvre during hyperthermia

2023· article· en· W4381136670 on OpenAlex
Blake G. Perry, Stephanie Korad, Toby Mündel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersMassey UniversityUniversity of Otago
KeywordsMedicineHyperthermiaCardiologyValsalva maneuverInternal medicineAnesthesiaBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background During hyperthermia, the perturbations in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) produced by the Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) are more severe. However, whether these more severe VM‐induced changes in MAP are translated to the cerebral circulation during hyperthermia is unclear. Methods Healthy participants ( n = 12, 1 female, mean ± SD: age 24 ± 3 years) completed a 30 mmHg (mouth pressure) VM for 15 s whilst supine during normothermia and mild hyperthermia. Hyperthermia was induced passively using a liquid conditioning garment with core temperature measured via ingested temperature sensor. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) and MAP were recorded continuously during and post‐VM. Tieck's autoregulatory index was calculated from the VM responses, with pulsatility index, an index of pulse velocity (pulse time) and mean MCAv (MCAv mean ) also calculated. Results Passive heating significantly raised core temperature from baseline (37.9 ± 0.2 vs. 37.1 ± 0.1°C at rest, p < 0.01). MAP during phases I through III of the VM was lower during hyperthermia (interaction effect p < 0.01). Although an interaction effect was observed for MCAv mean ( p = 0.02), post‐hoc differences indicated only phase IIa was lower during hyperthermia (55 ± 12 vs. 49.3 ± 8 cm s − 1 for normothermia and hyperthermia, respectively, p = 0.03). Pulsatility index was increased 1‐min post‐VM in both conditions (0.71 ± 0.11 vs. 0.76 ± 0.11 for pre‐ and post‐VM during normothermia, respectively, p = 0.02, and 0.86 ± 0.11 vs. 0.99 ± 0.09 for hyperthermia p < 0.01), although for pulse time only main effects of time ( p < 0.01), and condition ( p < 0.01) were apparent. Conclusion These data indicate that the cerebrovascular response to the VM is largely unchanged by mild hyperthermia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it