Metabolomics-Guided Identification of a Distinctive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Signature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major contributor to cancer-related morbidity and mortality burdens globally. Given the fundamental metabolic activity of hepatocytes within the liver, hepatocarcinogenesis is bound to be characterized by alterations in metabolite profiles as a manifestation of metabolic reprogramming. METHODS: H-NMR) spectroscopy whereas specific metabolites were quantified using targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS). RESULTS: H-NMR dataset identified a principal component (PC) one of 53.3%, along which the two sample groups were distinctively clustered. Univariate analysis of tissue specimens identified more than 150 metabolites significantly altered in HCC compared to non-tumoral liver. For LC/MS, PCA identified a PC1 of 45.2%, along which samples from HCC tissues and non-tumoral tissues were clearly separated. Supervised analysis (PLS-DA) identified decreases in tissue glutathione, succinate, glycerol-3-phosphate, alanine, malate, and AMP as the most important contributors to the metabolomic signature of HCC by LC/MS. CONCLUSIONS: H-NMR and LC/MS metabolomics have the capacity to distinguish HCC from non-tumoral liver. The characterization of such distinct profiles of metabolite abundances underscores the major metabolic alterations that result from hepatocarcinogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".