MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381149643 · doi:10.24043/001c.81234

Island Studies Journal 4(2), Book Reviews

2009· article· en· W4381149643 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIsland Studies Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeltic languagesHistoryAnthropologyArt historySociologyLiteratureArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary Issues in Manx Culture.During the past several decades, the Isle of Man has undergone a remarkable process of cultural and linguistic revitalization.Issue 5 (2006) of Celtic Cultural Studies, an "interdisciplinary on-line journal," features a series of articles that focus on various aspects of this revitalization process.Although the title of this special edition is "Contemporary Issues in Manx Culture", the articles reveal both the contemporary manifestations and the historical roots of the Isle of Man's cultural rejuvenation.The articles explore different, yet complementary, aspects of contemporary culture in the Isle of Man.In her article "The Story of Mann and All That, or How Heritage Became History Again", Susan Lewis uses a thespian backdrop to reinforce a broader point about the importance of making the Isle of Man's history and culture relevant and alive to islanders and newcomers alike.Jennifer Kewley Draskau's piece on "Ethnocultural Linkage in Language Revival: The Role of Joshua Fishman's Yians in Xish Revitalization: The Case of Manx Gaelic" examines the contributions that non-Manx have made to the preservation and promotion of the Manx Gaelic language.In "Shaping the Shape-Shifter: Cultural Revival, Spirituality and the Manx Manannan", Breesha Maddrell traces the efforts of cultural revivalists to resurrect Manannan, the Celtic sea-god, patron and protector of the Isle of Man.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsland Studies JournalSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207