Antimicrobial and antivirulence saponins of <i>Mimusops laurifolia</i> leaves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mimusops laurifolia is a native species restricted to the Red Sea mountains and Gulf of Aden. Its leaves contain saponins with wide range of biological activities. The presented research aimed to prepare saponins-rich extract from n-butanol fraction of M. laurifolia leaves and screen it for promising antimicrobial activities. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the prepared saponins against Candida albicans, and their potential anti-pathogenic and antivirulence effects were determined. Different concentrations of the saponins-rich extract were investigated for their antimicrobial potential, particularly against C. albicans, using the agar well diffusion method. To assess the potential antivirulence and antipathogenic effects, we carried out molecular docking of the bioactive saponins against four key enzymes in C. albicans, which are involved in virulence and/or pathogenicity. Different concentrations of the investigated mixture showed notable antifungal activity against C. albicans with an MIC value of 6.4 μg ml-1. Docking analysis of the investigated saponins showed their affinity toward the docked enzymes, particularly saponin 1 with secreted aspartic proteinase 3 and saponin 6 with secreted aspartic proteinase 5. Thereafter, the stability of these two protein-ligand interactions was investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The molecular interactions between saponins and the enzymes' active sites were analyzed and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".