Investigation on the influential mechanism of FA and GGBS on the properties of CO2-cured cement paste
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present work, the synergetic effect of fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) on the early compressive strength and microstructure development of CO 2 -cured mortars was investigated. A rim of several micrometers was found around carbonated cement particles, which contained not only silica-rich gel but also crystal calcium carbonate . The calcium carbonate formed around the cement particles were surrounded by an amorphous layer of around 3 nm, while no layers were observed around the calcite formed on FA or GGBS particles. The calcite formed on FA particles were hexagonal plate shaped, while the one on GGBS particles were rhombohedral shaped. The use of FA resulted in the increase of crystal size and crystallinity of calcite , while GGBS decreased the crystal size of calcite . The incorporation of FA and GGBS increased the calcite content and polymerization of silica-rich gel. However, this didn't result in a higher compressive strength . This was due to the looser microstructure and nanopores within the carbonation products compared to the pure ordinary Portland cement sample. The compressive strength of the ternary binder system showed linear relationship with capillary pores and the crystal size of calcite. Moreover, the effect of GGBS on the compressive strength reduction was more obvious than that of FA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it