MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381187351 · doi:10.24043/001c.81300

Island Studies Journal 6(2), Book Reviews

2011· article· en· W4381187351 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIsland Studies Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIvory towerSubtitlePower (physics)DisciplineConstitutionSociologyHistoryPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In The Ivory Tower and Beyond, Doug Munro examines the work of five Pacific historians who in various ways moved beyond the expected responsibilities of a university lecturer: teaching and archival research (and administration, but that is seen by both Munro and his subjects as a chore to be endured) -and in doing so have shaped the way Pacific history as a sub-discipline has developed.Munro, citing Maxine Berg (biographer of Eileen Power), suggests that historians 'deserve to be remembered'; in part because their interests and activities outside the academy shape the history they write (p. 6).The 'participant historian' of the subtitle, as used by Munro, covers several types of outside involvement: civic involvement unrelated to professional expertise, constitutional and governmental responsibilities that draw on professional expertise, extensive use of fieldwork, and writing which moves across disciplinary boundaries.One might quibble about whether all these activities should be included, but that seems ungenerous.In practice the breadth of possible activities 'beyond the ivory tower' adds great interest to the accounts.The key chapter of the book is the one on J.W. Davidson (1915-73), the acknowledged 'father' of the sub-discipline of Pacific History.It does not cover his constitution-making in detail; rather it looks at the precursors to that involvement, showing how Davidson's PhD study at Cambridge allowed him to move beyond the Eurocentric focus on British or French policy in the Pacific to investigate informal rather than formal agents of empire: traders, settlers, the men on the spot.He was also able to work with the anthropologist Raymond Firth, even though Firth was at the London School of Economics.The focus on anthropological understanding along with close examination of events in the islands led to the development of the 'island-centred history' that the Australian National University Pacific historians were to promote under Davidson's leadership after his appointment as Professor of Pacific History in 1952.Munro also shows how Davidson's constitutional work for Samoa and the Cook Islands was prefigured in the influence of Lord Hailey and of Margery Perham, which also advocated self-government by the late 1940s.Interestingly, the University of the South Pacific Library's current copy of Hailey's African Survey is inscribed 'JW Davidson 1943'.Other chapters demonstrate other forms of activity 'beyond the Ivory tower'.Munro investigates the civic involvement of John Beaglehole , who as well as editing Cook's and Banks' Journals and writing a biography of Cook, was involved in disputes over freedom of speech at the University of New Zealand, and criticised the actions of the New Zealand government over the Waterfront Strike Emergency Regulations in 1951, and both sides of politics for bribery during the 1957 elections.His musical interests led to involvement with various arts organizations, and a somewhat unseemly row about the conductor of the National Orchestra in 1946.Munro's sad chapter on Richard Gilson, whose book Samoa, 1830-1900 was finished posthumously by his wife Muriel, and Davidson, emphasises Gilson's anthropological insights and obsession with detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1080.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsland Studies JournalSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207