Island Studies Journal 6(2), Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In The Ivory Tower and Beyond, Doug Munro examines the work of five Pacific historians who in various ways moved beyond the expected responsibilities of a university lecturer: teaching and archival research (and administration, but that is seen by both Munro and his subjects as a chore to be endured) -and in doing so have shaped the way Pacific history as a sub-discipline has developed.Munro, citing Maxine Berg (biographer of Eileen Power), suggests that historians 'deserve to be remembered'; in part because their interests and activities outside the academy shape the history they write (p. 6).The 'participant historian' of the subtitle, as used by Munro, covers several types of outside involvement: civic involvement unrelated to professional expertise, constitutional and governmental responsibilities that draw on professional expertise, extensive use of fieldwork, and writing which moves across disciplinary boundaries.One might quibble about whether all these activities should be included, but that seems ungenerous.In practice the breadth of possible activities 'beyond the ivory tower' adds great interest to the accounts.The key chapter of the book is the one on J.W. Davidson (1915-73), the acknowledged 'father' of the sub-discipline of Pacific History.It does not cover his constitution-making in detail; rather it looks at the precursors to that involvement, showing how Davidson's PhD study at Cambridge allowed him to move beyond the Eurocentric focus on British or French policy in the Pacific to investigate informal rather than formal agents of empire: traders, settlers, the men on the spot.He was also able to work with the anthropologist Raymond Firth, even though Firth was at the London School of Economics.The focus on anthropological understanding along with close examination of events in the islands led to the development of the 'island-centred history' that the Australian National University Pacific historians were to promote under Davidson's
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".