MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Birth rates of urban Kazakhs: socio-economic development and socio-cultural environment (in the second half of the 20th and the first quarter of the 21st centuries)

2023· article· en· W4381189704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhanna Aubakirova, Gulzhan Sarsembayeva, Nelly Krasnobayeva, Eleonora Stolyarova, Alexander V. Alekseyenko

Bibliographic record

VenueOOO Zhurnal Voprosy Istorii · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKazakhQuarter (Canadian coin)Ethnic groupBirth ratePopulationGeographyCultural backgroundDemographyEthnologySocioeconomicsHistorySociologyResearch methodologyAnthropologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article discusses the peculiarities of reproductive behavior of the urban population of Kazakhstan in the 20th - early 21st century. on the example of the Kazakh ethnic group. The birth rate of the urban Kazakh population is one of the highest in the post-Soviet space. According to the authors, this is due to the fact that the main socio-cultural parameters affecting demographic processes did not undergo drastic changes in the 19th - 20th centuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOOO Zhurnal Voprosy IstoriiSame topicRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsFrench-language works237,207