Genome Editing in Ferret Airway Epithelia Mediated by CRISPR/Nucleases Delivered with Amphiphilic Shuttle Peptides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gene editing strategies are attractive for treating genetic pulmonary diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF). However, challenges have included the development of safe and effective vector systems for gene editing of airway epithelia and model systems to report their efficiency and durability. The domestic ferret ( Mustela putorius furo ) has a high degree of conservation in lung cellular anatomy with humans, and has served as an excellent model for many types of lung diseases, including CF. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of amphiphilic shuttle peptide S10 for protein delivery and gene editing using SpCas9, and AsCas12a (Cpf1) ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). These approaches were evaluated in proliferating ferret airway basal cells, polarized airway epithelia in vitro , and lungs in vivo , by accessing the editing efficiency using reporter ferrets and measuring indels at the ferret CFTR locus. Our results demonstrate that shuttle peptides efficiently enable delivery of reporter proteins/peptides and gene editing SpCas9 or Cpf1 RNP complexes to ferret airway epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo . We measured S10 delivery efficiency of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-nuclear localization signal (NLS) protein or SpCas9 RNP into ferret airway basal cells and fully differentiated ciliated and nonciliated epithelial cells in vitro . In vitro and in vivo gene editing efficiencies were determined by Cas/LoxP-gRNA RNP-mediated conversion of a ROSA -TG Cre recombinase reporter using transgenic primary cells and ferrets. S10/Cas9 RNP was more effective, relative to S10/Cpf1 RNP at gene editing of the ROSA -TG locus. Intratracheal lung delivery of the S10 shuttle combined with GFP-NLS protein or D-Retro-Inverso (DRI)-NLS peptide demonstrated efficiencies of protein delivery that were ∼3-fold or 14-fold greater, respectively, than the efficiency of gene editing at the ROSA -TG locus using S10/Cas9/LoxP-gRNA. Cpf1 RNPs was less effective than SpCas9 at gene editing of LoxP locus. These data demonstrate the feasibility of shuttle peptide delivery of Cas RNPs to the ferret airways and the potential utility for developing ex vivo stem cell-based and in vivo gene editing therapies for genetic pulmonary diseases such as CF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".