Improving Path Planning Performance through Multimodal Generative Models with Local Critics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel method for accelerating path planning tasks in unknown scenes with obstacles by utilizing Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks (WGANs) with Gradient Penalty (GP) to approximate the distribution of the free conditioned configuration space. Our proposed approach involves conditioning the WGAN-GP with a Variational Auto-Encoder in a continuous latent space to handle multimodal datasets. However, training a Variational Auto-Encoder with WGAN-GP can be challenging for image-to-configuration-space problems, as the Kullback-Leibler loss function often converges to a random distribution. To overcome this issue, we simplify the configuration space as a set of Gaussian distributions and divide the dataset into several local models. This enables us to not only learn the model but also speed up its convergence. We evaluate the reconstructed configuration space using the homology rank of manifolds for datasets with the geometry score. Furthermore, we propose a novel transformation of the robot's configuration space that enables us to measure how well collision-free regions are reconstructed, which could be used with other rank of homology metrics. Our experiments show promising results for accelerating path planning tasks in unknown scenes while generating quasi-optimal paths with our WGAN-GP. The source code is openly available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".