Paul Kennedy, Victory at Sea: Naval Power and the Transformation of the Global Order in World War II by Mark Klobas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviews 423 a veteran, might hold a professional appreciation for certain wartime tactics and technologies regardless of who wielded them, praising U-534's tactical competence and Admiral Graf Spee's Nazi commander as a hero, even to his adversaries, glosses over too quickly the genocidal regime served by the commander and both aforementioned vessels.With millions of shipwrecks globally, though, and an author-stated mission of remembering those lost at sea, the book falls short on a more fundamental level.Eurocentric and biased toward wrecks dating to between 1900 and the present, the supposed superlatives encompassed in the text are a smattering of stories more similar than they are distinct, all but ignoring the contributions of seafarers and seafaring technology from most of Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Latin America.When ships from these regions are detailed, comparatively more time is spent emphasizing the mechanical shortcomings of the vessels and the technical ineptitude of the crews than for their European and North American counterparts.Historically, seafaring in Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Latin America has been not only an important part of global maritime trade and exploration, but it was often a forebearer of technologies and skills such as astronomical navigation, mariner's compasses, stern-hung rudders, and the perennially-popular catamaran hull style.Temporally and geographically limiting what qualifies as exceptional and worthy of memory, whether tacit or explicit, reifies Enlightenment-informed notions of European exceptionalism stemming from the Age of Sail and the mythos of savage others.The obfuscation of global sailing histories in both the recent and deep past in a book dedicated to "those who have no known grave but the sea" inherently values those lives that are in the social memory of living Britons more than the countless many who came before them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".