Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents a brief overview of foreign and domestic studies of Old Icelandic bish-ops’ sagas. This genre of sagas tells about the life of the Icelandic bishops of the 11th–14th centuries and is a valuable source on both ecclesiastical and secular history of medieval Iceland. The emphasis in this article is on the analysis of the historiography of Árna saga biskups Þorláksson, the Icelandic bishops’ saga, which was written in the first quarter of the 14th century. The saga is an important source of Icelandic history from the late 1260s to 1290s. In particular, it tells about the activities of the Skálholt Bishop Árni Þorláksson (1237–1298). In russian historiography, the Árna saga biskups Þorláksson has not been practically studied at the moment, while in the works of foreign authors the issues of dating and au-thorship of the saga have been studied, the sources used by the author of the saga have been studied, and a comparative analysis of the saga with some of the Norwegian legal sources of the second half of the 13th century has been carried out. Also, on the basis of this saga, the conflict between secular and church authorities and, directly, the role of Bishop Árni in this conflict was analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".