MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381302454 · doi:10.1109/tia.2023.3281311

Non-invasive Detection of Rotor Inter-turn Short Circuit of a Hydrogenerator Using AI-Based Variational Autoencoder

2023· article· en· W4381302454 on OpenAlexaff
Rony Ibrahim, Ryad Zemouri, Bachir Kedjar, Arezki Merkhouf, Antoine Tahan, Kamal Al‐Haddad, F. Lafleur

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderRotor (electric)VibrationFault (geology)Cluster analysisFinite element methodFault detection and isolationArtificial intelligenceSIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringSensitivity (control systems)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringAcousticsStructural engineeringPhysicsActuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a non-intrusive technique for detecting the Rotor Inter-Turn Short Circuit (RITSC) of a hydrogenerator using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) based Vari- ational AutoEncoder (VAE). The technique is applied to a large hydrogenerator of 74 MVA and 76 poles, to test its health monitoring and classification potential. The model is trained and validated based on the acquisition of real vibratory data collected in situ from a healthy machine. The frequency pattern of the fault in the vibration signal is obtained based on Finite Element Methods (FEM). Then, to test the sensitivity of the model in early fault detection, the signature is injected into another set of real healthy vibration signals, and the results are compared to those obtained using the traditional vibration monitoring technique. Furthermore, clustering in the latent space of the model is explored. The obtained results prove the ability of this technique and its potential in detecting anomalies at earlier stages as well as its capacity to cluster different degrees of severity of the fault in a 3D user-friendly space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207